| From: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Training events policy ... first test case |
| Date: | 2007-10-24 05:40:35 |
| Message-ID: | 200710240740360000@3228930778 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
> > Also, given enough companies and bad scheduling luck, you can
> > always get bumped off the main page, so I think we should approve them
> > all.
>
> They problem is that we *know* we have companies who are scheduling
> training sessions which will never be held, in order to keep their names
> in that "top 3". Maybe we need to revisit how training events are listed
> on the home page?
If we _know_ they do this why don't we put a clear policy on what's allowed (which we should do anyway) and if they break that we limit them to _zero_ posts for a couple of months until they start complying?
Unrelated, we could change the frontpage to only show the first event per company. The rest would only be listed on the details page.
/Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-10-24 06:52:04 | Re: Problem with survey code |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2007-10-23 22:07:28 | Re: Training events policy ... first test case |