Re: Atomicity in DB transactions (Rollback related)

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jasbinder Singh Bali <jsbali(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Atomicity in DB transactions (Rollback related)
Date: 2007-06-18 15:54:44
Message-ID: 20070618155444.GA13688@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Jasbinder Singh Bali escribió:
> Hi,
> I have a Pl/Perlu function in which I have a statement like this:
>
> *******************
> my $query_tbl_l_header = $dbh->prepare("SELECT
> sp_insert_tbl_l_header(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)");
>
> my $exec_l_from
> =$query_tbl_l_header->execute($unmask_id,$from,$to,$sender,$subject,$replyto,$cc,$bcc,$messageid,$inreplyto,$reference,$mversion,$con_type,$con_id,$con_des,$con_enc,$con_length,$con_dis);
> *******************

You have a PL/PerlU opening an independent transaction via DBI? That's
a bad idea and the explanation to your problem. You should be using SPI
instead; there are methods for this in PL/Perl.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.advogato.org/person/alvherre
"Hay que recordar que la existencia en el cosmos, y particularmente la
elaboración de civilizaciones dentro de él no son, por desgracia,
nada idílicas" (Ijon Tichy)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Tokmatchi 2007-06-18 15:55:00 Postgres VS Oracle
Previous Message Francisco Reyes 2007-06-18 15:51:15 Re: pg_restore out of memory