| From: | Warren Turkal <wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: SCMS question |
| Date: | 2007-02-24 07:24:19 |
| Message-ID: | 200702240024.19990.wt@penguintechs.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 23 February 2007 17:30, Gregory Stark wrote:
> The distributed systems sound neat and do sound like they match our style
> of working. But they seem like a big leap for a project that's still using
> a buggy unmaintained pile of spaghetti code for fear of change. Subversion
> is the path of least resistance in that nothing has to change, we can
> choose to use new features if we want but otherwise it's basically a CVS
> 2.0 with a new name (and active maintenance).
The interesting thing about Git is that is has two way sync support for a SVN
repository also. You could run a Git repository pushing changes in real time
to a SVN repository and present a CVS frontend also. I would like to try
converting the CVS repository of PostgreSQL to Git and try setting some of
this stuff up. Does anyone know how I could get the CVS repository files?
wt
--
Warren Turkal (w00t)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Warren Turkal | 2007-02-24 07:28:35 | Re: SCMS question |
| Previous Message | Warren Turkal | 2007-02-24 07:20:46 | Re: SCMS question |