Re: xml type and encodings

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, nikolay(at)samokhvalov(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: xml type and encodings
Date: 2007-01-15 22:59:41
Message-ID: 200701152359.41687.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> We should error out on any explicit encoding that conflicts with the
> client encoding. I don't like the idea of just ignoring an explicit
> encoding decl.

That is an instance of the problem of figuring out which encoding names
are equivalent, which I believe we have settled on finding impossible.

> Are we going to ensure that what we hand back to another client has
> an appropriate encding decl? Or will we just remove it in all cases?

We can't do the former, but the latter might be doable.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Darcy Buskermolen 2007-01-15 23:13:35 Re: Autovacuum improvements
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-01-15 22:35:13 Re: xml type and encodings