Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Karen Hill <karen_hill22(at)yahoo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Date: 2006-10-17 20:43:41
Message-ID: 20061017204341.GH31297@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Karen Hill wrote:

> I have 8.2 Beta 1 (Win32) on my home pc and offset was faster than
> fetching relative to the last key as measured by explain analyze. This
> was on a table with about 1,000 rows.

For such a small table the difference is probably irrelevant. Try with
several million rows.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message George Pavlov 2006-10-17 20:55:21 Re: query log corrupted-looking entries
Previous Message Karen Hill 2006-10-17 20:37:06 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Woodward 2006-10-17 20:45:49 Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
Previous Message Mark Woodward 2006-10-17 20:42:58 Re: Syntax bug? Group by?