Re: Syntax bug? Group by?

From: "Mark Woodward" <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
To: "Joe Sunday" <sunday(at)csh(dot)rit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Syntax bug? Group by?
Date: 2006-10-17 20:42:58
Message-ID: 18197.24.91.171.78.1161117778.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:41:25PM -0400, Mark Woodward wrote:
>
>> The output column "ycis_id" is unabiguously a single value with regards
>> to
>> the query. Shouldn't PostgreSQL "know" this? AFAIR, I think I've used
>> this
>> exact type of query before either on PostgreSQL or another system, maybe
>> Oracle, and it did work.
>
> Doesn't work in Oracle 10g:
>
> SELECT ycis_id, tindex from x where ycis_id = 15;
> YCIS_ID TINDEX
> ======= ======
> 15 10
> 15 20
>
> SELECT ycis_id, min(tindex), avg(tindex) from x where ycis_id = 15;
> ORA-00937: not a single-group group function
>
> SELECT ycis_id, min(tindex), avg(tindex) from x where ycis_id = 15 GROUP
> BY ycis_id;
> YCIS_ID MIN(TINDEX) AVG(TINDEX)
> ======= =========== ===========
> 15 10 15

That's interesting. I am digging through the SQL99 spec, and am trying to
find a definitive answer.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-10-17 20:43:41 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD
Previous Message Karen Hill 2006-10-17 20:37:06 Re: more anti-postgresql FUD