Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Status of funds.postgresql.org?
Date: 2006-09-17 18:09:46
Message-ID: 200609172009.47917.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Tom Lane wrote:
> Um ... how does "we need service X" translate to "we need service X
> to be provided on a new hostname rather than www.postgresql.org"?
> Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought the objection was to
> hostname proliferation not service proliferation.

I'm wondering not only about hostnames but about hosts. Who is going to
manage these boxes?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-17 18:25:16 Re: [HACKERS] Developer's Wiki
Previous Message Md.Abdul Aziz 2006-09-17 17:16:28 Re: [pgsql-www] Developer's Wiki