Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love

From: Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love
Date: 2006-09-10 23:52:37
Message-ID: 20060910235236.GA81626@winnie.fuhr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 07:38:24PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> > I spent a few minutes doing the same tests I did a few months ago
> > and found problems with dblink and ltree; I'll submit patches for
> > those. Tom, do you recall which modules gave you trouble?
>
> Um ... hstore and tsearch2, I think. I fixed those, but was thinking
> that other stuff might crawl out from under similar rocks.

I don't see an uninstall script for hstore; that one needs to be
written. The latest untsearch2.sql looks good in my tests.

Should untsearch2.sql be renamed to uninstall_tsearch2.sql to be
consistent with all the other uninstall scripts?

--
Michael Fuhr

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-10 23:57:32 Lock partitions
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-09-10 23:44:22 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Back out patch added during

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-09-11 00:25:17 Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-09-10 23:38:24 Re: contrib uninstall scripts need some love