| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project |
| Date: | 2006-09-02 16:21:29 |
| Message-ID: | 200609021821.29622.peter_e@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> There are a number of reasons for this, not least of which is the
> enormous and ever-changing requirements such a system would have to
> have.
> The buildfarm is an excellent example of this.
The build farm is not an example of this. There isn't any build-farm
software out there. There is, however, plenty of issue tracking
software out there.
Just pointing that out. Have at it. I for one would rather set up
existing issue trackers and work with them. If I could just find
hardware to host it. Not that I've looked, though.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-02 16:22:48 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
| Previous Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2006-09-02 16:20:57 | Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-09-02 16:22:48 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
| Previous Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2006-09-02 16:20:57 | Re: Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project |