Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM initscript

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Enver ALTIN <ealtin(at)parkyeri(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Sander Steffann <s(dot)steffann(at)computel(dot)nl>, pgsqlrpms-hackers(at)pgfoundry(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM initscript
Date: 2006-08-25 15:14:49
Message-ID: 200608251714.50887.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Am Freitag, 25. August 2006 17:17 schrieb Enver ALTIN:
> Am I the only one who believes that PostgreSQL project is not supposed
> to fix (or include workarounds for) some other systems that actually
> don't work very well?

Yes.

> If NFS is causing trouble, let it be.

NFS is not the trouble.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-25 15:16:23 Re: Safer auto-initdb for RPM init script
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2006-08-25 15:11:54 Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build