Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM initscript

From: Enver ALTIN <ealtin(at)parkyeri(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Sander Steffann <s(dot)steffann(at)computel(dot)nl>, pgsqlrpms-hackers(at)pgfoundry(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [Pgsqlrpms-hackers] Safer auto-initdb for RPM initscript
Date: 2006-08-25 15:17:45
Message-ID: 20060825151745.GB9461@golf
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merhaba,

On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 10:30:56AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> It is extremely careful. The point is that the NFS mount will hide the
> existing datadir from initdb.

Am I the only one who believes that PostgreSQL project is not supposed
to fix (or include workarounds for) some other systems that actually
don't work very well?

If NFS is causing trouble, let it be.

Thanks,
--
Enver

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-08-25 15:21:27 Re: Tricky bugs in concurrent index build
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-08-25 15:17:25 Re: [HACKERS] psql 'none' as a HISTFILE special case