Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)is(dot)rice(dot)edu>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: BugTracker (Was: Re: 8.2 features status)
Date: 2006-08-18 20:38:26
Message-ID: 200608181338.27878.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

All,

I chatted some with some of the Debian folks who maintain Debbugs. They
thought it would take a significant amount of work to adapt it to
PostgreSQL, in addition to the obvious needs to improve the web interface.

RT has some significant short comings for our project such as not having
good support for tying bugs to versions etc. As people have pointed out,
it's a "Request Tracker", not necessarily a Bug Tracker.

On the other hand, a lot of my personal dislike of BugZilla seems to be
based on being forced to use old versions. A lot of the stuff I hate
about it has been fixed in the current version.

So, the question is whether any of our biggest bug-fixers would dig in
their heels and scream "No!" if we gave BugZilla a try. Comments?

--
--Josh

Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Fuhr 2006-08-18 21:17:14 Re: [PATCHES] plpython improvements
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-08-18 20:27:23 Re: [PATCHES] plpython improvements