From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: plPHP and plRuby |
Date: | 2006-07-24 17:45:37 |
Message-ID: | 20060724174537.GK5223@surnet.cl |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >Am Montag, 24. Juli 2006 18:49 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
> >>Side question -- is it plRuby or PL/Ruby? We should be consistent. I
> >>just noticed the top-level README file has all the wrong names -- what
> >>is "pl/c" for starters? Or plPgsql? We've _never_ used those names.
> >
> >I'm beginning to think that this is part of some obscure plot by Joshua
> >Drake to confuse people.
>
> I sincerely hope you are kidding.
I understand that he is.
> >I advise all committers not to take any documentation
> >patches from him without careful scrutiny.
>
> Gah... aren't you just all sour grapes. The README was reviewed by
> several people, in fact it went through two versions to the patches list.
I saw those fly by and my gut feeling was "whoever commits this is
_certainly_ going to fix it". I'm not sure why I didn't comment on it.
> Sorry that nobody caught it (including myself), but good lord it isn't
> that big of a deal.
Consistency is important. It may not be _THAT_ big a deal, but we
should be at least a little careful.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joachim Wieland | 2006-07-24 17:47:58 | Re: Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to - try 4 |
Previous Message | Marc Munro | 2006-07-24 17:31:13 | Making config file parser available to add-ins |