Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re: [CORE] GPL
Date: 2006-06-26 15:07:54
Message-ID: 200606261107.55341.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday 26 June 2006 03:28, Dave Page wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Treat [mailto:xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net]
> > Sent: 24 June 2006 20:50
> > To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> > Cc: Andrew Dunstan; Tom Lane; Dave Page
> > Subject: Re: Anyone still care about Cygwin? (was Re:
> > [HACKERS] [CORE] GPL
> >
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > wasn't someone just trying to donate a machine to us for the
> > website but we
> > weren't sure what to do with it? One that could do VM's?
> > Seems we could use
> > that for some buildfarm members maybe.
>
> As with most of these, the two I was discussing recently fell through
> (usual problem, company making the offer seems to think we run the
> entire project off one ancient server, and therefore think that the
> celeron box they offer will entitle them to be listed as hosts of the
> entire project).
>

Right, but I am thinking that maybe we should ask these guys if they can offer
boxes for the buildfarm, which could run from a celeron box.

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hannu Krosing 2006-06-26 15:15:58 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2006-06-26 14:58:53 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC