From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "A(dot)M(dot)" <agentm(at)themactionfaction(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Fabian Pascal and RDBMS deficiencies in fully |
Date: | 2006-06-09 19:18:54 |
Message-ID: | 200606091518.54597.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 09 June 2006 12:39, David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 12:29:59PM -0400, A.M. wrote:
> > >> Yes, and all SQL products worth their salt include some languages
> > >> to provide iteration and other processing that SQL can't do or
> > >> doesn't do well. Why must the rules be different for a truly
> > >> relational db. (see http://dbappbuilder.sourceforge.net/Rel.html)
> > >
> > > I may get interested if some actual software which implements
> > > Date's Relational Model ever comes out. Or I may not, as I am
> > > getting lots of useful work done using SQL and friends. We
> > > empiricists are like that.
> >
> > You mean like the Java software I pointed out in the link above?
> > It's an implementation of Tutorial D.
>
> Do let me know when somebody uses it. :)
>
So "as an empiricist", you have derived that programming in PHP, hitting a
mysql backend, atop a Windows OS, is far better than that wonky
perl/postgresql/linux stuff you normally work with, right?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jonathon McKitrick | 2006-06-09 19:49:39 | Re: Problem with 'postgres' db with 8.0 on a MacBook |
Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-06-09 19:07:20 | Re: State of Postgresql Replication? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-06-09 19:33:57 | List schema contents |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-06-09 19:02:50 | Re: That EXPLAIN ANALYZE patch still needs work |