Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Mischa Sandberg <mischa(at)ca(dot)sophos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS
Date: 2006-05-22 19:11:14
Message-ID: 200605221911.k4MJBEo15156@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:41:59AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > > CREATE TRIGGER name { BEFORE | AFTER } { event [ OR ... ] }
> > > ON table FOR EACH STATEMENT
> > > EXECUTE PROCEDURE funcname ( arguments )
> >
> > And that doesn't give you any information on the rows that were
> > modified. Other RDBMSes will provide a NEW rowset and an OLD rowset that
> > you can select from inside the trigger as if they were real tables.
>
> Is this on the TODO list? It doesn't seem too difficult to create a
> tuplestore and store the NEW and OLD tuples there and pass the whole
> set to the trigger.

TODO has:

* Allow statement-level triggers to access modified rows

--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-05-22 19:14:18 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)
Previous Message Dawid Kuroczko 2006-05-22 18:56:14 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-05-22 19:14:18 Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-22 19:01:51 pgbench create index anomoly