Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Mischa Sandberg <mischa(at)ca(dot)sophos(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Porting MSSQL to PGSQL (Was: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?)
Date: 2006-05-22 18:45:07
Message-ID: 20060522184507.GG24404@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:41:59AM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > CREATE TRIGGER name { BEFORE | AFTER } { event [ OR ... ] }
> > ON table FOR EACH STATEMENT
> > EXECUTE PROCEDURE funcname ( arguments )
>
> And that doesn't give you any information on the rows that were
> modified. Other RDBMSes will provide a NEW rowset and an OLD rowset that
> you can select from inside the trigger as if they were real tables.

Is this on the TODO list? It doesn't seem too difficult to create a
tuplestore and store the NEW and OLD tuples there and pass the whole
set to the trigger.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Woodward 2006-05-22 18:52:29 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-22 17:20:05 Re: [HACKERS] Toward A Positive Marketing Approach.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Woodward 2006-05-22 18:52:29 Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message April Lorenzen 2006-05-22 18:25:09 error-free disabling of individual child partition tables