| From: | "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Date: | 2006-05-20 15:34:26 |
| Message-ID: | 20060520153426.GW64371@pervasive.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:36:25AM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I really think that PostgreSQL could benefit from a packaged solution
> that incorporates a lot of the contrib stuff (tsearch2, maybe even some
> replication setups ..). I really like the approach that PostgreSQL is a
> clean yet highly extensible base from which other people can build their
> specific tools.
I think we're starting to see some of that, with things like the live
CD.
What I'd rather see time spent on is a framework that makes it easier to
grab things from pgFoundry. To use a bad example, think CPAN for
PostgreSQL.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-20 16:55:23 | Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-20 15:31:09 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-20 16:55:23 | Re: [HACKERS] [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
| Previous Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-05-20 15:31:09 | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |