Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-20 15:31:09
Message-ID: 20060520153109.GV64371@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 06:01:19PM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> On 5/19/06, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> >And with that, I am going to sit in a lawn chair and watch the bonfire.
>
> This is one of the finest examples of unfocused discussions I've ever
> seen on -hackers... while surely entertaining, what a huge waste of
> time.

I tried a few times to move it to -advococy...
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-20 15:34:26 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Mark Woodward 2006-05-20 14:41:21 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-20 15:34:26 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Mark Woodward 2006-05-20 14:41:21 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?