Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Lukas Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
Cc: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Date: 2006-05-20 08:42:32
Message-ID: 20060520084232.GC30476@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On Sat, May 20, 2006 at 10:36:25AM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:
> The improvements to the installer are great, but there simply needs to
> be a packaged solution that adds more of the things people are very
> likely to use. From my understanding Bizgres goes in that direction? I
> just think that whatever highly packaged solution PostgreSQL picks, this
> should be the download that is pushed at conferences, in articles and
> books. People with a clue will still know where they can get the clean base.

There is a fantastic packaged solution already:

apt-get install postgresql-8.1 postgresql-contrib-8.1

Voila! Tsearch installed at your fingertips. What else were you
expecting?

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Kahwe Smith 2006-05-20 08:48:41 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Lukas Smith 2006-05-20 08:36:25 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Kahwe Smith 2006-05-20 08:48:41 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?
Previous Message Lukas Smith 2006-05-20 08:36:25 Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad?