| From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: search.postgresql.org |
| Date: | 2006-03-25 20:18:51 |
| Message-ID: | 200603251518.52045.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On Saturday 25 March 2006 11:58, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > Um, what other resources are rated higher? If you'll pardon my
> > ignorance, what other resources is the search engine considering at all?
>
> Below is the weights. As John said earlier they just decide who's links
> show up first.
>
> It seems to me that archives should be secondly only to
> www.postgresql.org. Once the new techdocs is live and we get some solid
> content on there, then we can push that up.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> # User contributed stuff
> SiteWeight http://techdocs.postgresql.org/ 50
> SiteWeight http://archives.postgresql.org/ 50
>
Should planetpostgresql.org get added to this section?
Also maybe Oleg/Teodor could wiegh in with which sites they are currently
indexing in pgsql.ru ?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter Lamp :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Oleg Bartunov | 2006-03-25 20:49:00 | Re: search.postgresql.org |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2006-03-25 18:15:46 | Re: search.postgresql.org |