| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brian Kilpatrick <briank(at)sraapowergres(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Conventions for release numbering |
| Date: | 2005-06-14 16:28:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20050614132729.U90456@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Brian Kilpatrick wrote:
> The 3rd number however has, to the best of my analysis, never required a
> dump. So that I would have to call this 'revision', which would include
> updates and bug fixes, but not new features.
Actually, we've had several 'revisions' that have required dumps ... in
fact, I believe we've had at least one for every m.n release at some point
:(
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-06-14 16:48:11 | Re: Conventions for release numbering |
| Previous Message | Brian Kilpatrick | 2005-06-14 14:34:13 | Re: Conventions for release numbering |