Re: Conventions for release numbering

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Brian Kilpatrick <briank(at)sraapowergres(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Conventions for release numbering
Date: 2005-06-14 16:48:11
Message-ID: 200506140948.11442.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Brian,

> Of course, in the course of numbering of other products/projects its
> usually not the first 2 numbers that indicate an ersatz major release.
> They tend to stick to major.minor.other. Postgres 'seems' to do
> major1.major2.revision.

Actually, major1.major2.revision is consistent with several other OSS
projects, such as Linux, Apache, and BSD.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2005-06-16 03:13:23 O.k. OSCON -- call for SWAG
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2005-06-14 16:28:39 Re: Conventions for release numbering