Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general

From: Jeff Eckermann <jeff_eckermann(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: "Gary L(dot) Burnore" <gburnore(at)databasix(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Important Info on comp.databases.postgresql.general
Date: 2004-11-10 15:59:40
Message-ID: 20041110155940.40416.qmail@web20822.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


--- "Gary L. Burnore" <gburnore(at)databasix(dot)com> wrote:

> On 9 Nov 2004 15:51:24 -0800,
> pvaurio(at)solaris(dot)polarhome(dot)com wrote:
>
> >This is a very unfair limitation.
>
> Stop top posting.
>
> >If there is a ballot, it should be posted to each
> of the individual mailing lists.
>
> That's not how it works.
>
> >When/if a ballot appears in News Announce
> Newgroups, I will copy/paste and e-mail the
> >ballot to each of the PostgreSql mailing lists,
> once per week during
> >the 3 weeks of voting. The mailing list users will
> be most affected by
> >any voting outcome. I will not allow them to be
> left out of the
> >process. Many of the list subscribers do not use
> Usenet. I never posted
> >to a newsgroup before today.
> >
> >Additionally, I encourage all list members to vote
> yes. Please get
> >everyone you know to vote. We need to exceed the no
> votes by 100 in
> >order to pass. I am affiliated with a network of
> over 60 PostgreSql
> >users/developers, and I will e-mail each one of
> those people a ballot,
> >and it is safe to presume that essentially all of
> them will vote yes. I
> >encourage all proponents of saving the lists to do
> exactly the same,
> >within their scope of influence.
>
> You're trying to get it to fail, eh? Nice going.
>
>
> >I am stupefied by the downright arrogance of most
> of the news.groups
> >readership.
>
> Please. We're trying to help you fix something
> that's broken.

??? As a longstanding reader of the pgsql-
mailinglists, (including via news.postgresql.org on
occasion), all I see is some outsiders trying to help
us "fix" a problem that does not exist. And yes, I
have read most of the messages that have passed by in
these threads. After all that, I still don't see the
benefit.

Perhaps that is why these conversations have been
carried on almost totally by people who do not post to
the pgsql lists.

>
> > You people have the audacity try and dictate rules
> of
> >matters that do not affect your lives in the least.
>
> I've dealt with the day to day workings of USENet
> for more than 10
> years and there are a LOT of people who've been
> doing it longer.
>
> Try not making so many assumptions.
>
> >
> >Mr. Pauli Vaurio
>
>
> --
> gburnore(at)databasix dot com
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> How you look depends on where you
> go.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Gary L. Burnore |
>
> |
>
> DataBasix |
>
> | 3 4 1 4
> 2 6 9 0 6 9
> Black Helicopter Repair Svcs Division | Official
> Proof of Purchase
>
===========================================================================
> Want one? GET one!
> http://signup.databasix.com
>
===========================================================================
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Check out the new Yahoo! Front Page.
www.yahoo.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Eckermann 2004-11-10 16:11:01 Re: Lost databases
Previous Message Wayne Brown 2004-11-10 15:53:25 Re: These Lists Are Being Cut To FOUR