Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Troels Arvin <troels(at)arvin(dot)dk>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating
Date: 2004-10-15 03:24:58
Message-ID: 200410150324.i9F3Owt21113@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> >Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> There are three major standards: SQL-92, SQL:1999, and SQL:2003.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>Actually, they are just different versions of the single major standard.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Wording suggestion?
> >
> >
>
> There is only one current standard SQL:2003 correct? The rest are
> considered deprecated?

I don't think so. Some database say they are SQL99-compliant while not
SQL-2003 compliant.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2004-10-15 12:09:32 Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2004-10-15 01:36:26 Re: Some developer FAQ links need updating