| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| Date: | 2004-02-29 22:37:18 |
| Message-ID: | 200402291437.18554.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 pgsql-www |
Folks,
Re: moving the main project to GForge/whatever: we're not considering that at
this time.
The way the discussion got entangled is that a few people mentioned wanting a
better bug tracker than then one offered with GForge, and that we are
considering using a Bug Tracker for the main project.
If we do want an upgraded BT for the main project, it would make sense to use
the same BT for GForge/GBorg projects.
--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-03-01 01:41:32 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-02-29 22:31:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2004-02-29 23:40:59 | Re: Server Side PL support |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-02-29 22:31:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-03-01 01:41:32 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-02-29 22:31:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2004-03-01 01:41:32 | Re: Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-02-29 22:31:48 | Re: [HACKERS] Collaboration Tool Proposal -- Summary to date |