Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
Date: 2004-02-20 20:19:57
Message-ID: 200402201219.57949.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Dave,

> Well, hang on. Why Gforge? Are there other solutions? If so then I think
> any voting/discussions/whatever should include the choice of new
> platform.

Do you have another proposal? Like I said, I'll be putting forward the case
for GForge; if there's another program you like, feel free to
counter-propose.

But I'm not gonna spend a bunch o' time reseaching other platforms when I
believe that GForge suits our needs.

> It's also normal to have the discussion before a vote rather than the
> other way round as you are proposing (unless I misunderstand what you've
> written), so that people can make a properly informed vote.

As if I could prevent discussion. My point is that this has been discussed,
off and on, on this list and elsewhere repeatedly without any action being
taken. I'm going to throw up a specific proposal for action, and if people
shoot it down, then so be it. But just to discuss the topic in general --
again -- is a recipe for paralysis.

--
-Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marc G. Fournier 2004-02-20 20:36:37 Re: PDF docs in CVS broken
Previous Message Dave Page 2004-02-20 20:11:20 Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration