Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration

From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
Date: 2004-02-20 20:11:20
Message-ID: 03AF4E498C591348A42FC93DEA9661B889F44D@mail.vale-housing.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com]
> Sent: 20 February 2004 19:25
> To: PostgreSQL WWW Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
>
> Dave,

Hi Josh,

> > What's come up recently? I don't remember seeing anything.
>
> It wasn't on public lists, mostly. Let's just say that a
> few people are
> *very* dissatisfied with GBorg and might like to try
> something else. Also,
> we've been discussing having a bug tracking utility for the
> main project, particularly for the 7.5 release.

That one's been going on on and off for years! Still, I don't think it
would be a bad idea. Even Linux has proper bug tracking these days.

> HOWEVER, this is all hypothetical. I need to poll this
> list and Hackers
> first and get a vote from people, as well as having an
> organized proposal -- which is going to wait until we have a
> blank GForge up and running on Hub.org
> first. So let's postpone the rest of the discussion until
> that happens,
> hey?

Well, hang on. Why Gforge? Are there other solutions? If so then I think
any voting/discussions/whatever should include the choice of new
platform.

It's also normal to have the discussion before a vote rather than the
other way round as you are proposing (unless I misunderstand what you've
written), so that people can make a properly informed vote.

Regards, Dave.

Responses

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-20 20:19:57 Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2004-02-20 19:24:36 Re: GForge WAS: Feeds Integration