Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Date: 2003-11-11 06:23:16
Message-ID: 200311111153.16252.shridhar_daithankar@myrealbox.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Monday 10 November 2003 23:32, Josh Berkus wrote:
> Folks,
>
> PLEASE run your response by the list before sending it to them. The
> MySQL vs. PostgreSQL issue is a hot topic and we really don't want to make
> a bad impression on people outside our community.
>
> Also, I think it benefits us more to focus on our features rather than
> MySQL's shortcomings. MySQL *is* the appropriate database for some things,
> and we owe it to potential users to give them a fair evaluation of when
> PostgreSQL is appropriate, and when MySQL is.
>
> The MySQL team now has the general policy of doing the same thing (they
> didn't always, I know, but things have changed), and we can hardly afford
> to be seen as less fair than them.

OK, this was result of some efforts on advocacy, IIRC..:-)

http://sql-info.de/mysql/gotchas.html

Shridhar

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-11 06:55:39 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2003-11-10 20:49:01 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL