Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL advocacy <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL
Date: 2003-11-10 18:02:29
Message-ID: 200311101002.29047.josh@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Folks,

PLEASE run your response by the list before sending it to them. The MySQL
vs. PostgreSQL issue is a hot topic and we really don't want to make a bad
impression on people outside our community.

Also, I think it benefits us more to focus on our features rather than MySQL's
shortcomings. MySQL *is* the appropriate database for some things, and we
owe it to potential users to give them a fair evaluation of when PostgreSQL
is appropriate, and when MySQL is.

The MySQL team now has the general policy of doing the same thing (they didn't
always, I know, but things have changed), and we can hardly afford to be seen
as less fair than them.

--
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2003-11-10 18:04:46 Re: MySQLs' "FOREIGN KEYS¨
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-10 17:16:19 Re: FW: [webmaster] Comparison to MySQL