From: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Feature freeze and the great elog changeover |
Date: | 2003-06-25 23:35:47 |
Message-ID: | 20030625203505.B5387@hub.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
> I had originally planned to spend the next week editing all the elog()
> calls in the backend to convert them to ereport() format where helpful,
> add SQLSTATE values, and update wording to match the style guidelines
> that were agreed to awhile back.
>
> However, it looks like the same reasons that were holding me back still
> apply: any wholesale editing will likely break unapplied patches, plus
> I'll have to go back through the code when those patches do get applied.
> With folk scrambling to get last-minute stuff done before feature
> freeze, these are not good side-effects.
>
> What I'd like to do instead is try to get the editing done during the
> interval between feature freeze and the start of beta (which we've
> already agreed is July 1 - July 15). I do not feel that this violates
> the spirit of "feature freeze", but does anyone want to object to that
> plan?
Based on the reasons given, it sounds like it would be more harmful not to
do it when things are supposed to be frozen ... no objections here ...
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Arguile | 2003-06-25 23:36:34 | Re: Updating psql for features of new FE/BE protocol |
Previous Message | The Hermit Hacker | 2003-06-25 23:33:04 | Re: RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta) |