Re: Feature freeze and the great elog changeover

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Feature freeze and the great elog changeover
Date: 2003-06-25 23:35:47
Message-ID: 20030625203505.B5387@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote:

> I had originally planned to spend the next week editing all the elog()
> calls in the backend to convert them to ereport() format where helpful,
> add SQLSTATE values, and update wording to match the style guidelines
> that were agreed to awhile back.
>
> However, it looks like the same reasons that were holding me back still
> apply: any wholesale editing will likely break unapplied patches, plus
> I'll have to go back through the code when those patches do get applied.
> With folk scrambling to get last-minute stuff done before feature
> freeze, these are not good side-effects.
>
> What I'd like to do instead is try to get the editing done during the
> interval between feature freeze and the start of beta (which we've
> already agreed is July 1 - July 15). I do not feel that this violates
> the spirit of "feature freeze", but does anyone want to object to that
> plan?

Based on the reasons given, it sounds like it would be more harmful not to
do it when things are supposed to be frozen ... no objections here ...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Arguile 2003-06-25 23:36:34 Re: Updating psql for features of new FE/BE protocol
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2003-06-25 23:33:04 Re: RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta)