Re: RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta)

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael A Nachbaur <mike(at)nachbaur(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RServ patch to support multiple slaves (sorta)
Date: 2003-06-25 23:33:04
Message-ID: 20030625203243.O5387@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 25 Jun 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Patch applied. Thanks.
> >
> > > Michael A Nachbaur wrote:
> > >> Attached is a patch that provides *VERY* limited support for multiple slave
> > >> servers. I haven't tested it very well, so use at your own risk (and I
> > >> recommend against using it in production).
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > It sounded to me like that patch was intended for comment, not for
> > application.
>
> He said it wasn't all he wanted to do with the code, but that it did
> work. With so few rserv patches, it seems like something we should get
> in, but maybe not? Other comments? I am not sure myself.

Considering how many ppl have commented in the past how rserv was broken
anyway ... ? I'd say it can't hurt anything ...

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2003-06-25 23:35:47 Re: Feature freeze and the great elog changeover
Previous Message Joe Conway 2003-06-25 23:30:17 Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables