| From: | Andrew Sullivan <andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql on SUN Server |
| Date: | 2003-05-27 17:07:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20030527170709.GM3737@libertyrms.info |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:05:07AM -0600, scott.marlowe wrote:
> Correct. The max shared memory segment on 64 bit hardware is larger than
> any amount of RAM currently installable. I'm pretty sure the limit is
> so large that the overhead of handling a large segment would become a
> problem long before you'd be able to hit a hard limit.
Given that, in my experience, 1 Gig of shared buffer space totally
tanked performance on Solaris 7, the limiti is already so large that
handling a large segment is a problem ;-)
A
----
Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street
Liberty RMS Toronto, Ontario Canada
<andrew(at)libertyrms(dot)info> M2P 2A8
+1 416 646 3304 x110
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Ayers | 2003-05-27 17:18:48 | Re: Richard Huxton |
| Previous Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2003-05-27 16:32:43 | Re: newbie sql question... |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-05-27 17:48:09 | Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-05-27 16:49:33 | Re: [BUGS] Bug #928: server_min_messages (log_min_messages in CVS) |