Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode
Date: 2003-03-20 04:54:24
Message-ID: 200303200454.h2K4sOY22438@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


OK, I am for it, and two are against. Any one else want to vote this?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > The fix only changes the 'make it all one transaction' behavior. It
> > does not effect sending multiple queries in a string ---
>
> Yes it does! The results may change. Also the behavior if later
> commands in the string fail will be different (roll back earlier
> commands vs not).
>
> > But I do think the roll-queries-into-one-transaction is
> > strange and should be removed with the patch.
>
> I disagree. This is long-established behavior and no one has complained
> about it. We have gone out of our way to preserve it in past changes;
> I don't like suddenly deciding that backwards compatibility is
> unimportant. Especially not if only one person is in favor of the change.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-03-20 04:56:27 Re: A bad behavior under autocommit off mode
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-03-20 04:53:53 Re: Nested transactions: low level stuff