Re: infinity as a date

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jean-Christian Imbeault <jc(at)mega-bucks(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Peter Darley <pdarley(at)kinesis-cem(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: infinity as a date
Date: 2002-12-30 04:48:30
Message-ID: 200212300448.gBU4mUU19535@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general


Added to TODO:

* Allow infinite dates just like infinite timestamps

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jean-Christian Imbeault wrote:
> Peter Darley wrote:
> >
> > Not that I feel that I get a vote, but it seems to me that an infinite date
> > doesn't make any sense.
>
> I agree, but if you are going to have infinite timestamps, you should
> have infinite dates. A timestamp is a point in time after all ... just
> like a date.
>
> I don't care either way, I just want consistency.
>
> Jc
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
> (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Boget, Chris 2002-12-30 10:13:49 PHP & PostgreSQL
Previous Message David Busby 2002-12-30 03:55:40 Re: Fixed: Trouble with readline compiling on Redhat 8.0