Re: Slashdot article on PostgreSQL 7.3

From: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)persistent(dot)co(dot)in>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Slashdot article on PostgreSQL 7.3
Date: 2002-12-02 15:52:48
Message-ID: 200212022122.48727.shridhar_daithankar@persistent.co.in
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Monday 02 December 2002 08:21 pm, you wrote:
> While reading the debate, the MySQL benchmarks were brought up. It is
> apparent that we need to contact MySQL (even thought hey claim to have
> contacted us first) and run through a proper benchmarking. We should do a
> variety of tests that mimic what MySQL people get (i.e.. forget the foreign
> key constraints) and them against MySQL in transaction safe and
> non-transaction safe modes, along with PostgreSQL in all her glory.

Is it possible to get something like TPC-C on postgresql upto a limited scale?
May be TPC won't list it but we would ahve a repeatable benchmark to start
with..

Other way around is post numerous benchmarks on live system. We would set some
criteria as in what all should a entry consist of e.g.

* database size
* number of records
* kind of queries
* best and worst performances
* hardware design
* database design
* database tuning

etc. Now if we have say hundreds of these, that would give a pretty good idea
of postgresql abilities. After all, benchmarks are supposed to do the same
thing, isn't it?

Shridhar

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-12-02 18:09:46 Re: 7.4 Wishlist
Previous Message Marc G. Fournier 2002-12-02 15:37:52 Re: List of big names ... (fwd)