From: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist) |
Date: | 2002-09-26 02:07:17 |
Message-ID: | 200209260207.g8Q27HT25569@candle.pha.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> > ... I was running postmaster -d4, yet the only
> > query I saw was the last LOG one. I pretty sure that I would see all queries
> > with -d3 before..
>
> It looked to me like you were just running with the recently-added
> frill to log only queries that cause errors; which is on by default.
>
> (Looks at code...) Ah. It looks like -d to the postmaster no longer
> means anywhere near what it used to. Bruce --- compare the handling
> of -d in the backend (postgres.c lines 1251ff) with its handling in
> the postmaster (postmaster.c lines 444ff). Big difference. Are we
> going to make these more alike? If so, which one do we like?
I am sorry but I don't understand. They look like they both set
server_min_messages. There was a comment in one that said
client_min_messages but I just fixed that.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
unknown_filename | text/plain | 1.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-09-26 03:28:19 | Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist) |
Previous Message | Justin Clift | 2002-09-26 01:33:48 | Re: [HACKERS] New PostgreSQL Tool available :pg_autotune |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-26 02:11:48 | Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2002-09-26 01:40:03 | Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS? |