Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Date: 2002-09-26 02:07:17
Message-ID: 200209260207.g8Q27HT25569@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk> writes:
> > ... I was running postmaster -d4, yet the only
> > query I saw was the last LOG one. I pretty sure that I would see all queries
> > with -d3 before..
>
> It looked to me like you were just running with the recently-added
> frill to log only queries that cause errors; which is on by default.
>
> (Looks at code...) Ah. It looks like -d to the postmaster no longer
> means anywhere near what it used to. Bruce --- compare the handling
> of -d in the backend (postgres.c lines 1251ff) with its handling in
> the postmaster (postmaster.c lines 444ff). Big difference. Are we
> going to make these more alike? If so, which one do we like?

I am sorry but I don't understand. They look like they both set
server_min_messages. There was a comment in one that said
client_min_messages but I just fixed that.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

Attachment Content-Type Size
unknown_filename text/plain 1.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-09-26 03:28:19 Re: postmaster -d option (was Re: [GENERAL] Relation 0 does not exist)
Previous Message Justin Clift 2002-09-26 01:33:48 Re: [HACKERS] New PostgreSQL Tool available :pg_autotune

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-26 02:11:48 Re: compiling client utils under win32 - current 7.3devel
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-09-26 01:40:03 Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?