Re: [GENERAL] Idea for the statistics collector

From: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: kleptog(at)svana(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Idea for the statistics collector
Date: 2002-06-21 03:55:38
Message-ID: 20020620235538.44eb4ec2.nconway@klamath.dyndns.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:50:04 -0400 (EDT)
"Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I have thought that some type of feedback from the executor back into
> the optimizer would be a good feature. Not sure how to do it, but your
> idea makes sense. It certainly could update the table statistics after
> a sequential scan.

Search the archives for a thread I started on -hackers called "self-tuning
histograms", which talks about a pretty similar idea. The technique there
applies only to histograms, and builds the histogram based *only* upon
the data provided by the executor.

Tom commented that it's probably a better idea to concentrate on more
elementary techniques, like multi-dimensional histograms, before starting
on ST histograms. I agree, and plan to look at multi-dimensional histograms
when I get some spare time.

Cheers,

Neil

--
Neil Conway <neilconway(at)rogers(dot)com>
PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-21 03:59:11 Re: [GENERAL] Idea for the statistics collector
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-21 02:50:04 Re: [GENERAL] Idea for the statistics collector

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-21 03:59:11 Re: [GENERAL] Idea for the statistics collector
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-06-21 03:25:23 Re: What is wrong with hashed index usage?