Re: ecpg and bison again

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ecpg and bison again
Date: 2002-06-19 07:36:49
Message-ID: 20020619073649.GE2783@feivel.credativ.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 04:41:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> > How about we add the preproc.c file generated by bison 1.49 to cvs?
> > Could that create problems elsewhere?
>
> Yes. It's a bad idea to put derived files in CVS. For one thing,
> CVS will not guarantee that their timestamps are right compared to
> the master file.

Actually I thought about changing the makefile as well, so preproc.c
does not look like a derived file anymore.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael(at)Fam-Meskes(dot)De
Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire!
Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Griffiths(RA) 2002-06-19 09:37:20 Missing library files??
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2002-06-19 07:35:25 Re: ECPG won't compile anymore