Re: ksqo?

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> > > Hmmm... Well, I'll take a look at it, but I'll probably just leave it
> > > be -- since the optimization might actually return invalid results, it
> > > doesn't seem like a very valuable thing to have, IMHO.
> >
> > Yeah, I never cared for the fact that it altered the semantics of the
> > query, even if only subtly. But I'm hesitant to rip out something that
> > someone went to the trouble of writing and contributing ...
>
> If it does nothing, we certainly should remove it from GUC so people
> don't see a meaningless option. We can then keep it in CVS to see if we
> want it later.

Here is the email from May 28 discussing the removal of GUC.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026