Re: ksqo?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ksqo?
Date: 2002-05-29 01:47:19
Message-ID: 200205290147.g4T1lJo24867@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Neil Conway <nconway(at)klamath(dot)dyndns(dot)org> writes:
> > Hmmm... Well, I'll take a look at it, but I'll probably just leave it
> > be -- since the optimization might actually return invalid results, it
> > doesn't seem like a very valuable thing to have, IMHO.
>
> Yeah, I never cared for the fact that it altered the semantics of the
> query, even if only subtly. But I'm hesitant to rip out something that
> someone went to the trouble of writing and contributing ...

If it does nothing, we certainly should remove it from GUC so people
don't see a meaningless option. We can then keep it in CVS to see if we
want it later.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

  • Re: ksqo? at 2002-06-16 00:09:56 from Bruce Momjian

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-05-29 03:29:08 Re: Polygons passed to poly_overlap have 0 pts when column is indexed using rtree
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2002-05-29 01:33:49 Re: Replication status