Re: rename() vs. link(); building from source

From: Jason Tishler <jason(at)tishler(dot)net>
To: "David P(dot) Caldwell" <inonit(at)inonit(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-cygwin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: rename() vs. link(); building from source
Date: 2002-05-12 20:26:04
Message-ID: 20020512202604.GB1908@tishler.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-cygwin

David,

On Sun, May 12, 2002 at 10:24:04AM -0400, David P. Caldwell wrote:
> Maybe we should revise the patch to reflect the current source tree?

Yes.

> I'm
> not at all familiar with protocol in this case, but if you want me to do
> something, let me know.

It is usually best to submit patches against the current CVS -- it
increases the chance that they will be accepted.

> Of course, I suppose I should confirm that my install is working first ...
> :)

Yes! Although, it seems that Barry Pederson has already done the
honors...

Jason

In response to

Browse pgsql-cygwin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jason Tishler 2002-05-12 20:51:56 Re: rename() vs. link(); building from source
Previous Message Jason Tishler 2002-05-12 20:14:02 Re: plpgsql.dll path