| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)fourpalms(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: beta3 |
| Date: | 2001-11-19 03:42:43 |
| Message-ID: | 20011118224215.F82429-100000@earth.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Okay, how do we want to address/fix/test this?
On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > The packaging problems need to be solved before we can build a release
> > candidate --- but I don't see why they should hold up beta3. beta2 has
> > the same problems, so beta3 wouldn't be a regression.
>
> Considering the history of how-do-we-get-the-docs-in-the-tarball problem,
> I'd like to see at least one beta where this works before shipping a
> release candidate. Otherwise I'll have no confidence at all that we're
> not going to ship the final release with last year's docs and no man
> pages.
>
> --
> Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-11-19 04:37:11 | format_type infelicity |
| Previous Message | Brent Verner | 2001-11-18 23:25:34 | Re: TODO item inquiry/claim |