Re: syslog by default?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: syslog by default?
Date: 2001-09-12 14:20:38
Message-ID: 200109121420.f8CEKcg06696@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Tatsuo Ishii writes:
>
> > Why are you so worrying about finding syslog() in configure? We have
> > already done lots of function testings. Is there anything special with
> > syslog()?
>
> All the other functions we test for come with a replacement plan. Either
> we choose between several similar alternatives (atexit/on_exit), or we
> link in our own function.o file. But we don't shut off a whole piece of
> functionality when one goes missing (except in the cases I mentioned).
>
> I'm probably being paranoid. But you did ask what became of the idea, and
> that's what did, as far as I'm concerned...

OK, that makes sense. My only question is how many platforms _don't_
have syslog. If it is only NT and QNX, I think we can live with using
it by default if it exists.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-09-12 14:26:48 Re: Index location patch for review
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-09-12 12:45:10 Re: factorial doc bug?