Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
Date: 2001-07-20 15:25:53
Message-ID: 200107201525.f6KFPrO14632@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

> Tom Lane writes:
>
> > ISTM that it'd be a good thing if current versions of all the add-on
> > source files for both Debian and RedHat RPMs were part of our CVS tree
>
> If you want to take the job of keeping these up to date or the job of
> convincing all the 143 package developers out there to do that...
>
> All of these package files are in a CVS tree somewhere (or should be), and
> I would be happy to provide you with the links I use to poke around them
> on occasion, but it should not be our job to keep track of the fancies of
> operating system developers.

I am slightly concerned about bloating our CVS tree.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Jenkins 2001-07-20 15:26:38 Delegating User creation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-20 15:24:32 Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-07-20 15:26:59 Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-20 15:24:32 Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)