Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Oliver Elphick <olly(at)lfix(dot)co(dot)uk>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
Date: 2001-07-20 15:26:59
Message-ID: 01072011265903.00947@lowen.wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Friday 20 July 2001 11:24, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let me add that Red Hat is now distributing a different RPM with their
> Red Hat Database, or at least I think they are. Can someone confirm?

Trond may be able to.
--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-20 15:34:25 Re: How Postgresql Compares For Query And Load Operations
Previous Message Tom Jenkins 2001-07-20 15:26:38 Delegating User creation

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-20 15:29:28 Re: OID wraparound (was Re: pg_depend)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-20 15:25:53 Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)