Re: Good software takes 10 years

From: "Brent R(dot) Matzelle" <bmatzelle(at)yahoo(dot)com>
To: PostgreSQL-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Good software takes 10 years
Date: 2001-07-20 14:22:27
Message-ID: 20010720142227.11714.qmail@web13004.mail.yahoo.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

--- Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > > Nice article about good software taking ten years to
> develop. I think
> > > PostgreSQL can be classed at 15 years now, and it is being
> developed at
> > > Internet speed too:
> > > http://www.joelonsoftware.com/stories/storyReader$368
> >
> > I think the slashdot discussion is more interesting than the
> original
> > article:
> >
> > http://slashdot.org/developers/01/07/19/0145222.shtml
> >
> > In particular, the slashdotters observe that there's more
> than one
> > kind of software. For big projects, ten years seems about
> right...
>
> I am never sure if posting info about appropriate articles is
> ok for
> this list.

I believe that the article reinforces the idea that PostgreSQL
is a maturing product but also a product that will require years
of development before it starts running out of truly useful new
features and fixes. If you find other articles that also help
advocate the further development of the PostgreSQL code and
community then by all means post it to the list. That's my two
cents.

Regards,

Brent

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lamar Owen 2001-07-20 15:07:05 Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-07-20 14:05:30 Re: RPM source files should be in CVS (was Re: psql -l)