Re: iconv?

From: Patrick Welche <prlw1(at)newn(dot)cam(dot)ac(dot)uk>
To: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: iconv?
Date: 2001-07-13 16:25:08
Message-ID: 20010713172508.A7317@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 12:04:25PM +0900, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> > Has it ever been considered to (optionally) use the iconv interface for
> > character set conversion instead of rolling our own? It seems to be a lot
> > more flexible, has pluggable conversion modules (depending on the
> > implementation), supports more character sets. It seems to be available
> > on quite a few systems, too.
>
> I have not checked iconv seriously since it's not very portable among
> our supported platforms.

Just FYI, in the mutt readme:

- Mutt needs an implementation of the iconv API for character set
conversions. A free one can be found under the following URL:

http://clisp.cons.org/~haible/packages-libiconv.html

Cheers,

Patrick

In response to

  • Re: iconv? at 2001-07-12 03:04:25 from Tatsuo Ishii

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2001-07-13 16:27:46 Re: grant and SQL92
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-13 16:10:29 Re: AW: AW: Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum and Transactions