Re: iconv?

From: Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>
To: peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: iconv?
Date: 2001-07-12 03:04:25
Message-ID: 20010712120425I.t-ishii@sra.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Has it ever been considered to (optionally) use the iconv interface for
> character set conversion instead of rolling our own? It seems to be a lot
> more flexible, has pluggable conversion modules (depending on the
> implementation), supports more character sets. It seems to be available
> on quite a few systems, too.

I have not checked iconv seriously since it's not very portable among
our supported platforms.
--
Tatsuo Ishii

In response to

  • iconv? at 2001-07-11 18:15:25 from Peter Eisentraut

Responses

  • Re: iconv? at 2001-07-13 16:25:08 from Patrick Welche
  • Re: iconv? at 2001-07-13 19:18:47 from Peter Eisentraut

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-07-12 03:48:42 Re: [GENERAL] Re: Debian's PostgreSQL packages
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-12 02:40:13 Re: Possible bug in plpgsql/src/gram.y