Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Chad R(dot) Larson" <chad(at)eldocomp(dot)com>, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Alexey Borzov <borz_off(at)rdw(dot)ru>, Tim Barnard <tbarnard(at)povn(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)
Date: 2001-07-12 19:01:53
Message-ID: 200107121901.f6CJ1rb23695@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> >> ... I don't believe that anything as large as PIT recovery is
> >> going to magically appear out of the woodwork.
>
> > Someone told me they would do it. I will not disclose their name
> > because I don't think I have the right to do that.
>
> And if "hacker X" delivers a patch that large a week or so before beta,
> with no prior discussion of features or implementation techniques on
> the mailing lists, we'd accept it? Hacker X needs to be told that
> that's not how this project is run.

I hope "hacker X" is listening. :-)

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Guy Fraser 2001-07-12 19:06:55 Re: A small question about Red Hat
Previous Message Tom Lane 2001-07-12 19:00:16 Re: Re: Pg7.2 (was: vacuum and 24/7 uptime)